Compare Miro and FigJam side-by-side: pricing, key highlights, and which tool to choose for your workflow.
Miro is the market-leading online whiteboard platform, used by over 60 million users as of 2024 across product, engineering, marketing, and facilitation roles. It started as a simple sticky-note canvas and has grown into a substantial visual collaboration suite: the template library covers over 2,500 use cases, and integrations with Jira, Confluence, Figma, Asana, and Slack mean it fits into existing team toolchains. For UX teams specifically, Miro is most valuable for research synthesis (affinity diagrams, user journey maps), service blueprinting, and workshop facilitation. The pricing model has become a limiting factor for smaller teams: the free tier caps collaboration at three boards, and the Starter plan ($8/member/month billed annually) is necessary for serious work.
Category: ux design
Pricing: Unknown
FigJam is Figma's whiteboard product, launched in 2021 as a cheaper companion to the main Figma product ($3/seat/month vs $15). It is designed for the activities that happen before and around design work — brainstorming, affinity mapping, retrospectives, workshop facilitation, and journey mapping — rather than as a design tool itself. The tight Figma integration is the real value proposition: you can link FigJam boards to Figma files so design artefacts and the thinking behind them live in the same workspace. Built-in templates cover common UX research and workshop formats, and emoji reactions and cursor chat make remote workshops feel less formal. Its biggest weakness relative to Miro is a shallower template library and no advanced diagramming.
Category: design collaboration
Pricing: Freemium